3 ms·
> It's unfortunate that this article provides an analysis and critique of the roots of left-leaning "social justice" but absolutely zero analysis or critique of
by Slansitartop 9y ago
> It's unfortunate that this article provides an analysis and critique of the roots of left-leaning "social justice" but absolutely zero analysis or critique of the roots of right-leaning conservatism or libertarianism.
Why would an article about social justice ideology do that? It would be rightly viewed as a digression that should be edited out or turned into an independent article.
- pmoriarty 9y ago"Why would an article about social justice ideology do that?" Because it provides context for the very conservative complaints the article provides a platform for.
- Slansitartop 9y agoBut what you were asking for wasn't context, it was: > analysis or critique of the roots of right-leaning conservatism or libertarianism That's a full article in itself. Basically, it seems you are unhappy about the article's topic and focus, and wish an article about something else that's more tailored to your predilections. I'm sure you can find want you want elsewhere, given the current political climate and the fact that conservatism and libertarianism are far older and have been widespread for far longer than the relatively novel "social justice ideology" discussed here.
- ThrowawayR2 9y ago> * Because it provides context for the very conservative complaints the article provides a platform for.* "Conservative complaints"? I am a classical liberal and I find many of the concerns in the article to be valid, as do many other classical liberals.