Thats not charity - thats donating credibility. Whoever was quoted has precisely Zero current understanding of moderation and the challenges it faces. And wor

Thats not charity - thats donating credibility. Whoever was quoted has precisely Zero current understanding of moderation and the challenges it faces. And worse - they haven't reflected on what "technical acumen" resulting on anti-harassment tools means. Effective anti harassment tools can suss out intent, and by nature are also censorship tools. Effective tools which can identify intent are so far past invasion of privacy, that they may as well be categorized as assaults on specific ideas. If twitter does come up with this magical tool, then it's a sure bet that other nation states will also have this magic algorithm. This rule applies to all lesser tools for "anti-harassment". The solution sadly IS hiring more moderators, and journalists vetting. Which I suspect is impossible at the scale and message type twitter operates on.