I have to say i pereive it is weaseling out of the rules that one makes a claim and gets fired for another one. At the point of a single claim (the essay), anyt

I have to say i pereive it is weaseling out of the rules that one makes a claim and gets fired for another one. At the point of a single claim (the essay), anything contained in the memo that is not protected means you can fire for the protected things. Of course this is all a sham. He was not fired for discriminatory things he said but because of public outrage. What is the protection you get from that?