4 ms·
> i.e it cannot be counter-factually refuted, then it has to be handled as one possible explanation, however unlikely it is. ergo, we must accuse all others of
by ZephyrP 9y ago
> i.e it cannot be counter-factually refuted, then it has to be handled as one possible explanation, however unlikely it is.
ergo, we must accuse all others of whichever crimes are not literally logical impossibilities.
- bitL 9y agoNope, just keep it in your list of probable reasons. Like when you do particle filters, you have your most probable states but nevertheless keep probabilities that you are wrong and you are in fact in any of the other possible states.