4 ms·
While that may be true, in this instance he is quoting (nearly verbatim) from the study author: https://youtu.be/0vvl46PmCfE?t=1m41s https://youtu.be/0vvl46PmCf
by davidkuhta 9y ago
While that may be true, in this instance he is quoting (nearly verbatim) from the study author:
https://youtu.be/0vvl46PmCfE?t=1m41s https://youtu.be/0vvl46PmCfE?t=1m41s
- paulsutter 9y agoDoes this raise any questions for you about the objectivity of the study author?
- AboutTheWhisles 9y agoWhy are you asking him? He isn't defending it, he just pointed it out.
- gerdesj 9y agoAre you having a laugh? Soz, I should explain: Allow a speech about something a bit of leeway but if the source is bollocks, then call it out as such. Science is a thing. The scientific method is a thing. A speech at an event can be a bit wayward and take liberties but the original, quoted, research should be sound. Is it?
- im3w1l 9y agoScientists are just people who slept through a few more lectures than the rest of us. Of course they can be full of shit occasionally.
- skybrian 9y agoA big question mark is that they talk about it in the video but the study was apparently never published? (See other comments, below.)
- gerdesj 9y agoI read New Scientist and sometimes psychology research is mentioned there and given credence. How on earth is: "lips smacking, mouth open, drool at the corners of their mouths" science? By that I mean, it is not the sort of thing I would expect to see in a paper unless there were photographs of the effect as evidence.