> Whatever is keeping women to 20% of our field is artificial Sure, insofar as gender-aligned interests have some cultural basis, it’s definitely “artificial”.

> Whatever is keeping women to 20% of our field is artificial Sure, insofar as gender-aligned interests have some cultural basis, it’s definitely “artificial”. Do you think it’s something more than that? If so, why? > We don't need to keep re-litigating this on the front page of the site I notice that people who use this objection regularly are very selective about when they choose to raise it. I haven’t noticed anyone on this site raising this objection consistently - only when they feel they can get in the last word.