3 ms·

2560x2048 would be awesome (they exist but they cost about 5-10 times what a 2560x1440 does.. http://www.ieiworld.co.uk/products/MMD_5201M-1323-459.html http://

2560x2048 would be awesome (they exist but they cost about 5-10 times what a 2560x1440 does.. http://www.ieiworld.co.uk/products/MMD_5201M-1323-459.html http://www.ieiworld.co.uk/products/MMD_5201M-1323-459.html). Two of those side by side would be perfect. I have dual 2560x1440's at work (24") and that's nice but the extra 608 height would be great for things like Chrome devtools etc.

anfilt 9y ago
For the price of that. I would rather buy raw panels and build something my self. https://www.aliexpress.com/item/2560-2048-FHD-20-1-inch-LCD-Panel-NL256204AC15-02/1506992549.html https://www.aliexpress.com/item/2560-2048-FHD-20-1-inch-LCD-... Also medical monitors tend be very expensive for what they are, but have good contrast. Also a lot are only gray scale.
laythea 9y ago
"Two of those side by side would be perfect." When used in a discussion regarding the desirableness of the aspect ratio 4:3, 1:1 etc, I find this statement quite amusing :)
narimiran 9y ago
> *2560x2048 would be awesome (...) Two of those side by side would be perfect. You have just turned two 5:4 monitors into a 10:4 monitor - and the closest format to that exists in a form of current 21:9 monitors, with acceptable prices.