I didn't question his right to make a decision, I just wanted to know who was involved. It isn't an attack to remind someone they might be biased. It's not a

I didn't question his right to make a decision, I just wanted to know who was involved. It isn't an attack to remind someone they might be biased. It's not a threat as I have no interest in getting involved with a PyTorch fork. I didn't order to give more information, I asked. I want to quote him and his first answer didn't give very much info. I didn't accuse him of wasting my time by saying I spent several minutes looking. I just wanted to make it clear that I wasn't being lazy and wasn't able to find any public information on how PyTorch came to be lax. I didn't say they should roll over. My point is that I don't know if this is an effort built by a small group who have done most of the work and want to keep it a lax license, or if this is a codebase that has a large community of random people who might want that protection. You might know of PyTorch, but tons of people don't compared to Google's Tensorflow. Thanks for the tips!