5 ms·
Re: flagged status, I presume this submission was flagged for seeming "political". However, the concern, as I understand it, is over articles that are not so mu
by danielam 9y ago
Re: flagged status, I presume this submission was flagged for seeming "political". However, the concern, as I understand it, is over articles that are not so much "political" (many of those are never flagged), but rather blatantly "partisan" or "factional" (which can go unflagged as well). "Liberalism" here refers to something much deeper than partisan squabbling. It is a political philosophy having its most prominent origins in Locke, and a worldview that underpins Western democracies. As the article notes, both prominent American parties are in fact liberal parties in this sense. The question being addressed isn't "is the Democratic party finished?", but rather whether the liberal worldview and the liberal order is playing out its own demise. There are tensions deep within liberalism, e.g., between science and liberty, that we see manifest across the American political spectrum. Many of the issues raised in many submissions are grounded in a tacit and particular variation of liberalism. This article addresses the much more fundamental question whether liberalism as a whole, not a particular variation of it, has failed.
- grzm 9y agoThere are some topics that are just not usefully discussed on HN, even ones that many people are interested in. Part of it is the nature of internet forums in general, and some I think are due to HN in particular. This isn't meant as a judgement of either: it's not dissimilar to how you may want to talk about some things with one group of people and some things with others if you want a productive outcome. I suspect it was flagged at least in part due to expectations of the ensuing discussion.