4 ms·
Could be they're not threatened by marijuana so much as their other advertisers. It's not difficult to imagine an account with much deeper pockets and an oppos
by scelerat 16y ago
Could be they're not threatened by marijuana so much as their other advertisers.
It's not difficult to imagine an account with much deeper pockets and an opposing agenda making it clear that if CN takes money from "pro-drug" advertisers, then they'll pull their own.
- cilantro 16y agoI was mostly pointing out the irony that Conde Nast is continuing the legacy of William Randolph Hearst. My assertion isn't completely implausible though.