> [go is] everything C can do, but much better I have to disagree with this one. I tried go briefly, and what I found was that it provided a couple of relativ

> [go is] everything C can do, but much better I have to disagree with this one. I tried go briefly, and what I found was that it provided a couple of relatively nice high-level features (multiple return, nested functions, interface{} (although that doesn't count it's basically void*)), but that ultimatley it tried to constrict what I could do in a way that c didn't. Add to that that c somehow has much better metaprogramming than go even though literally every language ever made has better metaprogramming than c.