15 ms·
No radical developments? Near all medical expense is at present due to age-related disease. When the distinct and understood causes of aging can be treated as m
by reasonattlm 9y ago
No radical developments? Near all medical expense is at present due to age-related disease. When the distinct and understood causes of aging can be treated as medical conditions, which at present they are not, then that expense will be reduced. Rejuvenation biotechnology to repair the causes of aging is a going concern. The first legitimate, actual, real rejuvenation therapies that turn back one of the root causes of aging are in early human trials and preclinical development. They are largely low-cost. Efforts to slow aging by slowing those causes are a larger going concern. Those approaches are similarly largely low-cost. It is clearly the case that a tipping point has been reached in support for efforts to treat aging in order to, eventually, indefinitely postpone the mortality, cost, and suffering of old age.
Just ahead, in the next few years, there is the start of a massive shift in medicine for the old, medicine associated with the greatest costs. It is beginning now.
- aaavl2821 9y agoHave any well designed human studies shown a particular intervention is associated with a significant increase in lifespan? Call me skeptical, but we can't even treat Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, and the leading cause of death in the US is still cardiovascular disease after decades of drug development Plus, unless these drugs enable immortality I'd imagine they would just enable more people to live to older age, and then more people would get high cost illnesses