3 ms·
> because he makes nothing He does license patents, if IBM can prove one the licensed patent is based on one or more IBM patents, they could counter sue.
by patrickaljord 16y ago
> because he makes nothing
He does license patents, if IBM can prove one the licensed patent is based on one or more IBM patents, they could counter sue.
- kreneskyp 16y agoas i understood it you can patent improvements on patented technology even if you don't hold those patents. You just can't ever use your improvements without a license. If that really is true, then Paul Allen isn't infringing, the people who are licensing from him are.