> It's not so much as unbelievable as in the burden of proof is not met for causation. I agree that the burden of proof has not been met. From the studies cite

> It's not so much as unbelievable as in the burden of proof is not met for causation. I agree that the burden of proof has not been met. From the studies cited on this Wikipedia page[0] it appears some studies have found this effect but it's not an accepted conclusion. > Forgive me if I'm wrong, but aren't you also the HN user that tried to argue for taking away reproductive rights from poor people? Link? I don't recall posting that and I do not support reproductive coercion of any kind. Although I do believe that poor people having children are setting themselves and their children up for suffering and maybe I said they shouldn't do so? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variability_hypothesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variability_hypothesis