> more or less suited I would say "more or less preferred" is a more relevant and less acerbic metric to consider. I think James Damore's main thesis (or one

> more or less suited I would say "more or less preferred" is a more relevant and less acerbic metric to consider. I think James Damore's main thesis (or one of his main theses) was that men had more of a natural and biologically driven preference to work with things/machines. So if women were placed in these positions, it detracts from the narrative that "something mysterious happened in the 80s that caused women to flee the computer industry".