>>I don't know that I've ever seen someone call ML "Lisp without parentheses". My bad. It's called Lisp with types. From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML_(pro

>>I don't know that I've ever seen someone call ML "Lisp without parentheses". My bad. It's called Lisp with types. From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML_(programming_language) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML_(programming_language) Now. Haskell does look like a impractical scheme. Beyond that, today if you want it, you have typed racket. For a lot of people you could just go ahead use Racket/Lisp instead of Haskell instead.