If you want to read it benevolently (benevolent to the NLRB), you could also take it as a claim that his references aren't scientific, but pseudo-scientific[0].

If you want to read it benevolently (benevolent to the NLRB), you could also take it as a claim that his references aren't scientific, but pseudo-scientific[0]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience