3 ms·
The null hypothesis would be to accept the state of things as they are. If there are very few women in computer science, you wouldn't assume it was due to some
by topmonk 9y ago
The null hypothesis would be to accept the state of things as they are.
If there are very few women in computer science, you wouldn't assume it was due to some conspiracy or "systematic discrimination" without any proof. You wouldn't enact policies of reverse discrimination (affirmative action) to correct some supposed imbalance of the system.
You'd simply admit you don't know why, and search for proof of the reason.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- fixermark 9y agoA more correct null hypothesis is to accept the state of things as they are given signal from across time, though. Which raises the immediate question of why most programmers were women until recently.