4 ms·
I think the conclusion is false and the real culprit is low-sugar, not low-calorie. Insulin production is directly influenced by sugar levels. It is not influe
by originalsimba 9y ago
I think the conclusion is false and the real culprit is low-sugar, not low-calorie.
Insulin production is directly influenced by sugar levels. It is not influenced by caloric intake. I didn't read the whole article but I bet their method is flawed and further study is required.
- vevoo 9y agoI did read it. They might have other method issues, but not that one you mention. In this analysis the did not focus on insulin secretion or sensibility. You are right in a sense. The authors used to say that it does not matter what you eat, as far as is a lot of caloric restriction. That was back in 2016, when I interviewed them. I hope now they will disagree if someone comes with a 800 calorie diet made of sugar only.
- grater 9y agoIt's fat, not sugar https://nutritionfacts.org/2016/11/17/fat-is-the-cause-of-type-2-diabetes/ https://nutritionfacts.org/2016/11/17/fat-is-the-cause-of-ty...