3 ms·
I don't think so. He could have given away money in a more discreet fashion and it would be evident that he did so and not have been for publicity.
by taoistextremist 9y ago
I don't think so. He could have given away money in a more discreet fashion and it would be evident that he did so and not have been for publicity.
- tmnvix 9y agoMaybe he did and they were unaware of it (n.b. this is the circular argument).