2 ms·
Although there is a non snarky way to say what i was implying, i don't think it would have made much of a difference. I do feel there is an apt comparison in th
by jnordwick 9y ago
Although there is a non snarky way to say what i was implying, i don't think it would have made much of a difference. I do feel there is an apt comparison in there if you try to apply the same critique to government services. No reason to single out private services.
- maxxxxx 9y agoTo me you came across as one of the types who blames government for everything reflexively. I also think your comparison is not accurate. Going on welfare is not convenient in the sense of the article.
- mirashii 9y agoMaybe it would've made a difference. Your comment was downvoted because it put words into the author's mouth that were obviously not his own, about a topic that's going to be known to be controversial, and followed it up with absolutely zero substance. Many folks would happily debate the merit or lack thereof of welfare programs if they had some substantive opinion, statistics, or really content to debate about. Your comment was nothing but snark, and to dismiss the downvotes as downvoting the subject matter and not the snark is a second piece of disengaging snark that is also not contributing meaningfully to the discussion.