4 ms·

Richard Stallman was right. We didn't listen!

• moonbug22 9y ago
  ITYM 'we didn't care', for broad, market-making values of 'we'
• acomjean 9y ago
  I heard Stallman talk at graduate school in the early part of this century. I though he was a bit extreme at the time, but over time I've come to appreciate his position. Having software be open and modifiable is really quite an amazing thing. those open building blocks lets us do amazing things with software quite easily. Its time for an open source desktop os and software to go mainstream. We realize that apple is not reliable making developer grade notebooks and their unix underpinnings show that it is possible. Then onto phones. I feel open source software will keep the hardware from being too weird
  • bittercynic 9y ago
    For those who care about having OSS powered desktop/laptop, I think the situation isn't as bad as it's sometimes made out to be. Both Debian and Arch have worked very well for me, and been my primary OS for years. It is frustrating that we still can't really get full control of the hardware, but at least from the kernel on up we can have pretty complete control of software.
  • wvenable 9y ago
    All the open source software I use on daily basis auto-updates.
    • carapace 9y ago
      > “Free software” means software that respects users' freedom and community. Roughly, it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html Couldn't find anything specific in re: auto-updates though...