3 ms·
A few random thoughts: IPFS sounds a lot like what you want. Tahoe LAFS plays in this space a bit The newer distributed file systems I've seen don't like perm
by burkemw3 9y ago
A few random thoughts:
IPFS sounds a lot like what you want. Tahoe LAFS plays in this space a bit
The newer distributed file systems I've seen don't like permissions. They like cryptographically-backed capabilities. You have the permission to read the file because you have the ability to decrypt, through the key. (Of course, key management is easy </sarc>).
Some user-facing distributed filesystem talks drift into FUSE (or similar) territory. A TahoeLAFS dev talks about how users probably don't actually know what they want: https://plus.google.com/108313527900507320366/posts/ZrgdgLhV3NG https://plus.google.com/108313527900507320366/posts/ZrgdgLhV... (QUIBBLES: REAL FILESYSTEM VS. STORAGE APP section). This is probably less relevant for a package manager.
The first time I read about BitTorrent based deployment was from Facebook.
- chubot 9y agoThanks for the link! I've heard about Tahoe LAFS, but like a lot of these projects (Upspin, IPFS), I don't actually know anyone who uses them!