Paper ballots can be manipulated physically, the questions can be put in confusing ways, irregularities can exist in the counting process, and they can be physi

Paper ballots can be manipulated physically, the questions can be put in confusing ways, irregularities can exist in the counting process, and they can be physically lost. Yes, there can be observers that seal boxes, watch over the whole process, etc. But fraud can still exist even if they have full access. How is that any better, apart from an appeal to tradition?