4 ms·
As I read the article, it sounds like a more-accurate headline would be "Federal Judge Says Embedding an Infringing Tweet Can Be Copyright Infringement".
by ISL 9y ago
As I read the article, it sounds like a more-accurate headline would be "Federal Judge Says Embedding an Infringing Tweet Can Be Copyright Infringement".
- djsumdog 9y agoBut if you were commenting on or critiquing the photo or the narrative around it ... wouldn't that be fair use?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- RyanShook 9y agoMore accurate title would be, “Federal judge doesn’t understand how the internet works”
- mar77i 9y agoThanks for clearing that up. If the FSF interpretation is inaccurate in this concern, that means embedding infringing content is also infringing, but that doesn't pose a threat for embedding non-infringing tweets? The problem is, as usual, embedders cannot differenciate one from the other - how should you tell the person who made the picture and the person posting it apart? Of course, US being the US, nobody wants to step up to protect anything remotely a consumer...