3 ms·
From the Article (the actual notice): https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-349258A1.pdf https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-349258A1.
by spydum 9y ago
From the Article (the actual notice): https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-349258A1.pdf https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-349258A1.p...
They identified the device, and the service impairment stopped when he shut it off..
"On November 30, 2017, in response to the complaint
agents from the Enforcement Bureau’s New York Office confirmed by direction finding
techniques that radio emissions in the 700 MHz band were emanating from your residence in
Brooklyn, New York. When the interfering device was turned off the interference ceased. You
identified the device as an Antminer s5 Bitcoin Miner. The device was generating spurious
emissions on frequencies assigned to T-Mobile’s broadband network and causing harmful
interference."
- windlep 9y agoIt says the person shut it off and claimed it was an Antminer s5, not that the FCC verified what was causing the interference. Was there some additional 3rd party confirmation of what it actually was?
- jtoi626wiw2727 9y agoThe faraday cage hat crowd arrives
- terrantech 9y ago> You identified the device as an Antminer s5 Bitcoin Miner They only narrowed it down to his residence, then he himself said it's the miner. It's totally possible he used it as a scapegoat for something else he was running.