> So are RGNs a panacea? Not at all. This is very much a 1.0 release. They are raw and unpolished. Training them can be quite challenging, like I already mentio

> So are RGNs a panacea? Not at all. This is very much a 1.0 release. They are raw and unpolished. Training them can be quite challenging, like I already mentioned. They do comparatively well on novel protein topologies, but that’s because everyone else does so poorly. They do silly things like predict pretty awful secondary structure, and their predictions can have steric clashes and the like. If we accept his comparison to other results it seems RGNs have an unreasonable effectiveness for topologies...