3 ms·
For one thing we have no way of confirming what exact chemical compound such experimenters actually took, not to mention anything about the precise dosage. In
by dwringer 9y ago
For one thing we have no way of confirming what exact chemical compound such experimenters actually took, not to mention anything about the precise dosage. In many cases, the subjects don't either.
- Alex3917 9y ago> For one thing we have no way of confirming what exact chemical compound such experimenters actually took OK, but that's no different than any of the people in the Star Slate Codex article. If anything the people doing thumbprints are much more likely to have taken actual LSD than the people getting it indirectly from Sandoz since they were making it themselves.
- colecut 9y agothe purity of "actual LSD" can vary a lot, and is more important than the purity of most other substances. I would expect it more likely to be as close to pure as possible by scientists at Sandoz than someone doing thumbprints at home. But Owsley apparently did a great job from what I hear =p