> Generally, I think you'll get more efficient, effective, useful tests if you tailor the test data sets to the problems you see rather than going for blanket c

> Generally, I think you'll get more efficient, effective, useful tests if you tailor the test data sets to the problems you see rather than going for blanket coverage. Sure, but fuzzing and "throw everything and the kitchen sink at it" type testing will generally expose logic bugs you weren't aware existed. Aka the unknown unknowns. Its not like this is an either/or proposition, you could run the fuzzing type gauntlet tests every week or so.