I worded my comment poorly. You're right... the number in not artificial. And I agree with your point on humans being capable of many things. I want to live in

I worded my comment poorly. You're right... the number in not artificial. And I agree with your point on humans being capable of many things. I want to live in a society where people can make a living doing things they enjoy and are good at. My concern is that quotas for outcomes (rather than things that more directly measure discrimination) might end up achieving the opposite: on one hand encouraging people into positions that are not a good fit for them, through external incentives, while at the same time removing opportunities from others who would prefer them. Shouldn't measures of workplace satisfaction matter a hell of a lot more than the number of women on the board?