4 ms·
or not, as the case may be https://www.mongodb.com/compare/mongodb-postgresql https://www.mongodb.com/compare/mongodb-postgresql
by mat_keep 9y ago
or not, as the case may be https://www.mongodb.com/compare/mongodb-postgresql https://www.mongodb.com/compare/mongodb-postgresql
- furicane 9y agoYou're aware that the vendor will post gospel about their product on their own website? I'm not using Postgres, I use MySQL, but I can assert with 100% certainty that most of the "comparison" on that URL is just marketing bullshit. You're a prime example that this new-age bullshit works and that's what's worrying.
- mat_keep 9y agogreat. Do i declare i worked at mysql for 5 years as well? Both before and after Oracle acquisition
- furicane 9y agoHow's that relevant? You're neither lead architect nor does your employment at MySQL / Oracle mean anything. Many incapable developers score positions at big companies. Without facts, maths and measurement you can be Linus Torvalds for all I care. The article at the URL provided is simply marketing ploy. I'm experienced enough to notice what's wrong with the comparison, but I won't take that article apart to prove anything. If you believe Mongo is a product that helps you - perfect. Now, if you're thinking you'll convince me that it's great by berating another great product - well, that raises a red flag. Who says I've to use a single software vendor anyway?
- mat_keep 9y agoit was the reference to me as "You're a prime example that this new-age bullshit works and that's what's worrying". The same statements were leveled at anyone from mysql 10-15 years ago. I'm glad mysql works well for your use-case
- znep 9y agoAre you the Mat Keep who is Director of Product Marketing at MongoDB? If so then, FWIW, people don't often respond well to marketing links posted without identifying your connection to the company.
- mat_keep 9y agoyes, my bad, i should have done that
- Tostino 9y agoThat was a pretty trash piece of marketing.