The first point about the energy used to actually build ITER really does the article a disservice IMO. I mean you could make the same point about the LHC or bas

The first point about the energy used to actually build ITER really does the article a disservice IMO. I mean you could make the same point about the LHC or basically any kind of big scientific project, it feels shortsighted and besides the point. The rest of the article is more insightful, although if you followed discussions around ITER and tokamak technologies there's nothing really new in there. We're trying to put the sun in a box but we don't know how to build the box.