22 ms·
Absolutely not. None of this is possible or even desirable. We don't want to watch optimized video. We want to watch stories that move us, created by geniuses l
by e_b 9y ago
Absolutely not. None of this is possible or even desirable. We don't want to watch optimized video. We want to watch stories that move us, created by geniuses like Coppola, or whoever you think is good.
- doyoulikeworms 9y agoWhat if a story could be modified dynamically in order to maximize the chance that it moves you? Or to deepen its impact? I figured that’s what the GP post was getting at. Just more tools for geniuses to use to move us and move us more deeply.
- newscracker 9y agoIt makes a lot of sense, and though what I say may sound a bit ridiculous, I don't think most people are capable of making such decisions. They'd rather have some mindless entertainment than moving stuff (we already know this from what's shared on social media, and how TV news and reality shows thrive).
- golergka 9y agoWhy would you think that what we want, or, to be more exact, what we think we want, matters? The only thing that matters is what we end up watching more and not closing. A lot of people say that they want long, challenging reading but they end up reading Buzzfeed articles. Don't ask people what they want to do - watch what they actually do.
- 1337biz 9y agoThe question is probably a bit different - if there is a place for a new genere that is not a linear, sequential narrative model.
- icebraining 9y agoThere is, they're called video games.