4 ms·
There are many companies that try to force you to load external resources in an HTML version by putting the content in images. The same thing could happen with
by JoshMnem 9y ago
There are many companies that try to force you to load external resources in an HTML version by putting the content in images. The same thing could happen with AMP, where only an AMP version contains the actual content.
- adrianN 9y agoThere is always the "mark as spam" button.
- chrismorgan 9y agoBe careful with that spam button: it probably won’t do what you want, but will instead make your spam filter worse. Eventually a sufficiently capable filter will be likely to figure out that the thing these emails have in common is a poor text/plain part and adjust its weighting appropriately, but I’d expect it to take somewhere between “quite some time” and “a long time” to figure that out; in the mean time, it’ll mostly just serve to confuse the poor filter. (How customised spam filters work, in a nutshell: take your various signals—e.g. has HTML, has remote images, has no text, is sent from a known-spammy IP address, mentions large sums of money—and figure out which factors occur more often in spam than ham, and increase the importance assigned to them; if the email reaches a chosen threshold, it’s showing sufficient characteristics of a spam message to be considered probably spam.) SpamAssassin is probably the most widely-used spam filtering platform; I’m not certain that its standard rules are capable of deciding to filter on this sort of thing directly. I believe it has something around detecting overly short or non-representative text/plain parts, which is probably the primary signal this would coalesce around.