3 ms·
That isn't the assertion though. The assertion is that he shouldn't be able to charge whatever he wants.
by alexyim 16y ago
That isn't the assertion though. The assertion is that he shouldn't be able to charge whatever he wants.
- statictype 16y agoWell, true. But I think that's still a ridiculous assertion though.
- Gormo 16y agoI would have said. "Ok, 30% of the product relies on insider knowledge. You can have that for free. How much is the remaining 70% worth to you?" Apple wasn't paying for the same insider knowledge of their platform's functionality that they already had; they were paying for the additional work that created new functionality. I don't see any reason why he shouldn't have asked for as much as he thought the product was worth.