3 ms·
The natural state of an ASIC mining arms race is that any advantage forces centralization. For example, if you have the most cost-efficient miners, you can acqu
by ericb 9y ago
The natural state of an ASIC mining arms race is that any advantage forces centralization. For example, if you have the most cost-efficient miners, you can acquire more miners with your profits. Your competitors fall behind with each iteration. This forces a monoculture of mining machines as miners are forced to use the best-available miner. This leaves the entire system incredibly vulnerable to back-doors and state interference from that manufacturer.
Similarly, locations with the cheapest power force centralization of location, which forces centralization of state regimes presiding over miners.
Monero doesn't suffer from these centralizing forces as applying generalized computing power can be done with spare cycles and is still profitable at the margin. In other words, you might not buy a computer to mine Monero, but if you have one, it might make sense to use your spare cycles for mining. This gets you a widely distributed polyculture, which is the best kind of decentralization.
- mrb 9y ago«Your competitors fall behind with each iteration» I don't think so. Competitors will always try to catch up given how profitable it is to sell mining rigs. We certainly have been going through a phase over the last 2 years where Bitmain has been dominant, but today we have 3 manufacturers who have miners just as efficient as the Bitmain S9 (0.10 J/GH): • Canaan who just released the Avalon 821 (0.11 J/GH) • Ebang E10 (0.10 J/GH) • Halong is promising a miner just as efficient in "2 months"