3 ms·
I was disappointed to see this was just for the graphic, not for the actual design of the t-shirt.
by evanlivingston 9y ago
I was disappointed to see this was just for the graphic, not for the actual design of the t-shirt.
- dragonwriter 9y agoIn the US, an open source clothing design is superfluous since such designs are not usually protected (outside the scope of copyright, rarely qualify for patent, trade dress, or other protection.)
- gamblor956 9y agoClothing design in the copyright context means the pattern of the clothing, not images or text, and copyright for clothing generally applies to non-functional flourishes or design elements. In this case, the logos are derivative works of presumably copyrighted logos of open source projects.
- joostdecock 9y agoIm repeating myself, but have a look at freesewing.org, it's an open source platform for made-to-measure sewing patterns. Full disclosure: I'm the maintainer
- teon 9y agoWhat do you mean? There are actual print designs for t-shirt print shops!
- jeroen 9y agoThey probably mean instructions to create a t-shirt from raw materials.