>I'm not sure why this is highlighted as a bad thing. It, in and of itself, is not presented as a bad thing. It lays the foundation for a conclusion that some

>I'm not sure why this is highlighted as a bad thing. It, in and of itself, is not presented as a bad thing. It lays the foundation for a conclusion that someone with that goal, might be less that prefect at separating it from their good-faith attempt to report accurately on a sexualized office culture. Of course there are people who will not trust Wu's motivations. However, I'm trying to avoid that tangent by presenting a line of thought where even the most honest attempts to be fair, honest, accurate, etc... can be confounded by other motivations and it's worthwhile to bring those up. In general people are really bad at isolating multiple goals, we typically use systematic approaches and/or review from other people to minimize their influence when seeking accuracy.