4 ms·

Appleseed is already open to the public for whoever wants to download the source and install it (it took me about 2 min on a shared host, really easy). You can

Appleseed is already open to the public for whoever wants to download the source and install it (it took me about 2 min on a shared host, really easy). You can then disable invites on your node by going into the administrator and setting on "use invites" to "no". But in any case, they give out invites like water, you just have to email invite@appleseedproject.org. Since that's the beta testing site, they're looking for beta testers, not casual users. Diaspora does have publicity on it's side, I'll give it that. We'll see how user-friendly it's first release is in September.

viraptor 16y ago
I think you lost the typical user at "whoever wants to download the source". Facebook users don't want to do that. They also don't understand "download" or "source" in many cases. They can click the blue icon in the "internet window". (yeah - I know that's not as true nowadays as it was at the beginning of y2k, but I'm trying to make a point here...)
- thwarted 16y ago
  Sounds like the perfect opportunity to provide a hosted service. I've always thought the distributed social site concept had room for both those people who want to run things themselves and for service providers. Kind of like wordpress.
  - djacobs 16y ago
    Yes I agree. I, for one, plan to offer to host some of my good friends on my own VPS, along with my instance. (Diaspora, not AppleSeed.)
    - jlgbecom 16y ago
      I'd be interested to hear why you're more interested in hosting Diaspora instead of Appleseed?
      - Joeboy 16y ago
        My straightforward answer: because a bunch of my Facebook friends seem to be looking forward to moving to Diaspora and I doubt any of them has heard of Appleseed. It's possible that in a couple of months Diaspora will look a lot less like a Great White Hope. We will see.
      - djacobs 16y ago
        When I said "Diaspora, not Appleseed", that was meant as clarification of intent and not as a refusal to host Appleseed instances. That said, I'll only use Diaspora for myself, but that's based on personal preference. I know Ruby like the back of my hand and am comfortable with Rails. Also, my site's built in Rails, so Diaspora will probably integrate nicely.
    - igravious 16y ago
      If these things are meant to be federated and open shouldn't they interop?
- jlgbecom 16y ago
  Yeah, it's federated server software. It's meant to be run by people who provide a hosted environment for users. In other words, it's software for anyone who wants to run their own facebook-like site. Except that all the sites running it connect to each other. Once it's out of beta, most users will just go to a sign up page of any number of nodes out there (I think there's like 50 out there already? I'm not sure)
- WorkerBee 16y ago
  I think you lost the typical user at "whoever wants to download the source". Facebook users don't want to do that Typical facebook users are not early adopters. None of these projects are even close to targeting typical facebook users yet.

viraptor 16y ago

I think you lost the typical user at "whoever wants to download the source". Facebook users don't want to do that. They also don't understand "download" or "source" in many cases. They can click the blue icon in the "internet window". (yeah - I know that's not as true nowadays as it was at the beginning of y2k, but I'm trying to make a point here...)

thwarted 16y ago
Sounds like the perfect opportunity to provide a hosted service. I've always thought the distributed social site concept had room for both those people who want to run things themselves and for service providers. Kind of like wordpress.
- djacobs 16y ago
  Yes I agree. I, for one, plan to offer to host some of my good friends on my own VPS, along with my instance. (Diaspora, not AppleSeed.)
  - jlgbecom 16y ago
    I'd be interested to hear why you're more interested in hosting Diaspora instead of Appleseed?
    - Joeboy 16y ago
      My straightforward answer: because a bunch of my Facebook friends seem to be looking forward to moving to Diaspora and I doubt any of them has heard of Appleseed. It's possible that in a couple of months Diaspora will look a lot less like a Great White Hope. We will see.
    - djacobs 16y ago
      When I said "Diaspora, not Appleseed", that was meant as clarification of intent and not as a refusal to host Appleseed instances. That said, I'll only use Diaspora for myself, but that's based on personal preference. I know Ruby like the back of my hand and am comfortable with Rails. Also, my site's built in Rails, so Diaspora will probably integrate nicely.
  - igravious 16y ago
    If these things are meant to be federated and open shouldn't they interop?
jlgbecom 16y ago
Yeah, it's federated server software. It's meant to be run by people who provide a hosted environment for users. In other words, it's software for anyone who wants to run their own facebook-like site. Except that all the sites running it connect to each other. Once it's out of beta, most users will just go to a sign up page of any number of nodes out there (I think there's like 50 out there already? I'm not sure)
WorkerBee 16y ago
I think you lost the typical user at "whoever wants to download the source". Facebook users don't want to do that Typical facebook users are not early adopters. None of these projects are even close to targeting typical facebook users yet.