3 ms·
I feel like the problems you're describing are more workplace specific and not specific to the method of CR itself. For example, > They started humble and ende
by mlazos 9y ago
I feel like the problems you're describing are more workplace specific and not specific to the method of CR itself. For example,
> They started humble and ended afraid to do anything except simplest tasks.
It's the job of the team leads to create an environment where people (especially new people) shouldn't be afraid to try something out and learn from it. I've had plenty of CRs which went for some huge number of iterations when I first started, generally this was solved by spending some time thinking about designs on my own and then having a meeting with senior devs to discuss pros/cons and any suggestions before writing any code.
> Also, they got only and exclusively negative feedback.
This sounds really shitty, and this seems like a problem with the people on the team. I always try to put at least one positive thing in a CR after lots of criticism, and if there isn't that much criticism even better!
All in all it sounds like with or without CR, the team you're describing probably wouldn't be a pleasant place to work.
- watwut 9y agoI agree with you, through I am pretty confident the seniors were well meaning. Insecure in more then one way, but still well meaning people with no intention to cause anything bad. It is not that CR is has no place in the process. It is that it should not be primary tool for teaching, mentoring and leading. Nor talked about that way. Every forum and blog posts talks about CR as teaching tool and every discussion about juniors puts a lot of emphasis on CR and none on other tools. A lot of people think and act that way.