> Indeed, statistical significance testing revealed no difference between students of any tier when it came to interview performance. Ah, the classic confusion

> Indeed, statistical significance testing revealed no difference between students of any tier when it came to interview performance. Ah, the classic confusion between not finding enough evidence to prove there is a difference, and finding enough evidence to prove there is no difference. The juniors from elite schools in particular have fewer 1s and 2s and more 3s and 4s than the other juniors. Really, you found statistical evidence that they aren't from different distributions? I'd love to see it.