3 ms·
> Do you mean to say that Google cannot possibly do anything that isn't good? Really? No, that's not what I am saying, please don't put words in my mouth. My
by guessmyname 9y ago
> Do you mean to say that Google cannot possibly do anything that isn't good? Really?
No, that's not what I am saying, please don't put words in my mouth.
My comment is divided in three parts: 1) sarcasm 2) question and 3) counter argument.
The sarcasm is already labelled.
The question is what you assumed was an affirmation.
The counter argument is, "AMP works for some people", you said "AMP for email is good for Google alone" which proves that my counter argument is true. AMP, bad or not, works for some people (in your comment, Google employees), which is what I originally wrote in my parent comment. I don't see what do I need to reconsider from this. There is also comments in this thread from people who say they like AMP, probing my statement even more: "it works for some people".
- pwinnski 9y ago> How is that the "bad idea" passed over so many people at a company that praises itself of hiring some of the most smartest people in the field? That formulation is disingenuous at best, and your follow-up describing it as a "question" is just as bad. How is it that you think your comment was acceptable when so many people disagree at a website that praises itself for having some of the smartest commenters on the web? I hope that helps demonstrate the dishonesty of a question of that format. No need to answer.