4 ms·

You are right in the first part (I'm italian). Regarding people doing a good job, I don't know if this is the case. I tried to use this service (just to see how

by fmntf 9y ago

You are right in the first part (I'm italian). Regarding people doing a good job, I don't know if this is the case. I tried to use this service (just to see how it works), and: - "anonymous reports will be considered only in particular cases" (!) - you cannot report if you are a private person/company - you have no kind of legal counseling / protection - other limitations I'm not sure if it was designed to get actual reports or not.

jessaustin 9y ago
How anonymous could it be, if they know whether a reporter is a "private person/company"?
- fmntf 9y ago
  Look at the form, they ask for you are you working, in which departments, etc.. It is just silly!
  - mirgj 9y ago
    Not really, they ask you other information and only these market with * are required. In fact, only a few information are required. Your job title aka position (make sense in case is a manager reporting an illegal activity other than a cleaner which might have really small amount of information) the entity involved and if you work in that entity or you just had some sort of relationship. After all it make sense to have a big set of data to investigate in. If not would be complicated for anyone to understand what's going on. You're still reporting it at the anti corruption authority, so even if you give them more details you should be confident that they'll treat it carefully. All the personal data (such as name, last name and so on) are optional. And, if you choose to not share your personal data, the form will be considered only if you complied with a level of detail that's enough to do an eventual investigation (if not, since they can't reach you out to ask you or details, would be useless to say "on December 2014 I saw a guy giving 10 euro to another one in the aisle of the department X in the state company Y. But was too dark and I can't tell who they are").
yjftsjthsd-h 9y ago
In fairness, some of that might just be inherent to the problem space; for instance, only considering anonymous reports in some cases could be a defense against random accusations with no actual evidence.
jaclaz 9y ago
Also - fellow Italian here - I guess we must apologize for the English grammar/syntax in: >Error! :( >Your browser is not running Javascript that is required to use the whistleblowing client. >It's common believe that Javascript and security don't sound well together, for this reason we suggest to use the Tor Browser, an extremely tuned FireFox browser with Tor integrated. Here you can found and download the latest release of: Tor Browser. This said, the issue revolves more generally about the Italian Law, anonymous reports have much lesser credit/relevance than signed ones (this is understandable). Besides the internet/modern way, the concept of "esposto anonimo" (anonymous report ) is well planted in the Law, but has very low "relevance", basically if you send one you are just suggesting the Authority to look in a certain direction, but there is no guarantee whatever that they will do so.

by fmntf 9y ago

jessaustin 9y ago

How anonymous could it be, if they know whether a reporter is a "private person/company"?

fmntf 9y ago
Look at the form, they ask for you are you working, in which departments, etc.. It is just silly!
- mirgj 9y ago
  Not really, they ask you other information and only these market with * are required. In fact, only a few information are required. Your job title aka position (make sense in case is a manager reporting an illegal activity other than a cleaner which might have really small amount of information) the entity involved and if you work in that entity or you just had some sort of relationship. After all it make sense to have a big set of data to investigate in. If not would be complicated for anyone to understand what's going on. You're still reporting it at the anti corruption authority, so even if you give them more details you should be confident that they'll treat it carefully. All the personal data (such as name, last name and so on) are optional. And, if you choose to not share your personal data, the form will be considered only if you complied with a level of detail that's enough to do an eventual investigation (if not, since they can't reach you out to ask you or details, would be useless to say "on December 2014 I saw a guy giving 10 euro to another one in the aisle of the department X in the state company Y. But was too dark and I can't tell who they are").

yjftsjthsd-h 9y ago

In fairness, some of that might just be inherent to the problem space; for instance, only considering anonymous reports in some cases could be a defense against random accusations with no actual evidence.

jaclaz 9y ago

Also - fellow Italian here - I guess we must apologize for the English grammar/syntax in: >Error! :( >Your browser is not running Javascript that is required to use the whistleblowing client. >It's common believe that Javascript and security don't sound well together, for this reason we suggest to use the Tor Browser, an extremely tuned FireFox browser with Tor integrated. Here you can found and download the latest release of: Tor Browser. This said, the issue revolves more generally about the Italian Law, anonymous reports have much lesser credit/relevance than signed ones (this is understandable). Besides the internet/modern way, the concept of "esposto anonimo" (anonymous report ) is well planted in the Law, but has very low "relevance", basically if you send one you are just suggesting the Authority to look in a certain direction, but there is no guarantee whatever that they will do so.