Sorry for the typo. I will edit the post to show an uppercase B. This is still at least an order of magnitude below the 57 GB/s reported by praseodym This is

Sorry for the typo. I will edit the post to show an uppercase B. This is still at least an order of magnitude below the 57 GB/s reported by praseodym This is for a raid0, as I am only concerned with performance here. The chunk size is the default 512K. I can try 4k, but I haven't found the Samsung NVMe SM961 page size. The partitions are of course 4k aligned: Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name 1 4096 209719295 100.0 GiB FD00 Linux RAID 2 209719296 419434495 100.0 GiB FD00 Linux RAID 3 419434496 629149695 100.0 GiB FD00 Linux RAID 4 629149696 838864895 100.0 GiB FD00 Linux RAID 5 838864896 1048580095 100.0 GiB FD00 Linux RAID 6 1048580096 1258295295 100.0 GiB FD00 Linux RAID 7 1258295296 1468010495 100.0 GiB FD00 Linux RAID 8 1468010496 1677725695 100.0 GiB FD00 Linux RAID 9 1677725696 1875384974 94.3 GiB 8300 Linux filesystem 10 34 4095 2.0 MiB EF02 BIOS boot partition No drive is slower on independant benchmarks. I created the various partitions to also test that scenario by testing various combination of the 6 drives. Performance increases linearly until the 6th drive. If you want to try, give me your email and I'll send you the root password to play with SSH. I was setting md5 for psql tests but there's nothing on the server yet, you can also play as much as you want with /dev/md6 You can also get a AX160-NVMe at Hetzner.de. If you cancel before 14 days, there is no charge.