1) Opining aside, you are agreeing with my point. He is not being charged with molesting/raping two women. 2) I have read the entire allegation and accordant

1) Opining aside, you are agreeing with my point. He is not being charged with molesting/raping two women. 2) I have read the entire allegation and accordant police reports, på svenska, in the allegers own words. Våldtäkt directly and literally translates to rape, yes. Know of any examples where direct and literal translations don't work? ... You have not understood my point and answered another. His alleged behaviour is described as sexual misconduct for english speakers the world over. This point is brought up many times in this thread and whenever the case is discussed, it's equally disingenuous each time its wilfully conflated. 3-5) I have directly addressed the fallacious use of the word "conspiracy" in this context. I have shown explicit objective facts, including those detailed in this threads article, to articulated a highly unspeculative pattern of behaviour with deep historical precedent and blatant irregularities. You have dismissed that without addressing any of the content or fact and proffered a verifiably untrue assertion in return. --- You have not read what you have responded to, or not taken the time to think it through. Seek first to understand, then to shitpost ;)