3 ms·
Right, but their building block is 48 disks x whatever is best profitable (a mix of 4,6,8,10, and 12TB currently or similar). So each system is 500TB or less,
by sliken 9y ago
Right, but their building block is 48 disks x whatever is best profitable (a mix of 4,6,8,10, and 12TB currently or similar). So each system is 500TB or less, zfs is a filesystem for a single node not a distributed filesystem.
Even if we ignore that factor of 800 or so (400PB spread across 500 nodes), they still would need another factor of 128,000 before they would need ZFS's 65th bit.
Keep in mind it's 2^128 blocks, not 2^128 bytes.
Backblaze would need to consume the entire planets supply of disks for a very long time AND put all those disks connected to a single linux, freebsd, or solaris box. Only then would they need the 65th bit that ZFS has for addressing blocks.
- ryacko 9y agoNot really. Global hard drive production is more than 2^64 bytes or 18 exabytes (SI). https://www.anandtech.com/show/10098/market-views-2015-hard-drive-shipments https://www.anandtech.com/show/10098/market-views-2015-hard-...
- tempay 9y agoFrom that it looks like production is 130 exabytes for Seagate and Western Digital combined. Using the default block size on ZFS the limit is 128 * 1024 * 2^64 = 2 zettabytes. Even allowing for other manufacturers it's an order of magnitude more than global annual production.