3 ms·
It's just a start. They have a more powerful grasp on the world supply of food than the joint grasp of Google, Microsoft, and Apple on the computing world. You
by vadimberman 9y ago
It's just a start. They have a more powerful grasp on the world supply of food than the joint grasp of Google, Microsoft, and Apple on the computing world.
You'd be surprised how many "artisan", "organic", and "fair-trade" brands they own, too.
The full list of their brands did not fit in the main Wikipedia article, so they had to create a separate one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Unilever_brands https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Unilever_brands.
- aaronbrethorst 9y ago> You'd be surprised how many "artisan", "organic", and "fair-trade" brands they own, too. I get the quotes on "artisan," but why put them around two terms with very clear definitions? Fair trade: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_trade https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_trade Organic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_certification https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_certification
- thisacctforreal 9y agoI loosely assumed it was because they don't have much faith in them actually being organic or fair-trade.
- kodablah 9y agoFrom the top of your organic link: "Requirements vary from country to country". And the fair trade article also lists concerns with over-certification and validation consistency. To pretend they are very clear definitions when applied to products is wrong.