> So we should take away the power from the user to choose that for themself? Razer's lack of cooperation is not taking away freedom from the user. Razer did n

> So we should take away the power from the user to choose that for themself? Razer's lack of cooperation is not taking away freedom from the user. Razer did not promise to provide "Linux" support and they are not obligated to do so. The firmwares themselves are already non-free and generally have EULAs tied to them which take away that freedom . If you wanted that freedom of choice in the first place, you should have bought hardware that offers that. > How exactly does it hurt them to have unofficial Linux firmware? It does hurt Razer to have "unoffical Linux firmware" because they would have new liabilities, possible legal issues in terms of licenses or an image problem if an update results in a brick. I can't believe how many people think they are entitled to support for something that was never claimed to be supported. If you want "Linux" support, buy hardware that offers just that.