My understanding was that Satoshi Nakamoto is an alias / the true author(s) of that paper remains anonymous. For me that's where the scary bit of blockchain li

My understanding was that Satoshi Nakamoto is an alias / the true author(s) of that paper remains anonymous. For me that's where the scary bit of blockchain lies. i.e. It's very tempting to go the government conspiracy theory route of who's benefiting from making this public / is it possible that it's been crafted to look secure whilst having some fatal flaw which is not immediately obvious. I don't really believe that; but equally can't discount the possibility.