3 ms·
> Containers didn't become a popular tool because they don't add value. The use case for them has been clear for over four years now Well, yes, they did become
by dozzie 9y ago
> Containers didn't become a popular tool because they don't add value. The use case for them has been clear for over four years now
Well, yes, they did become popular despite not providing anything
substantially new. The main value of containers is that programmer who works
with network now doesn't need (initially) to understand how to configure the
network, which is a dumb idea by itself. All the other things added by
containers boil down to distributing a tarball with whole operating system, so
you can run that in a chroot.
From where I stand it seems that programmers didn't want to learn how to
build, distribute, and configure software with OS packages, so they invented
their own binary packages system.
- bananadonkey 9y agoThe irony here being I had to port our production RPM (rhel-based) build system to Docker just so it could have a reasonable API and be anything close to maintainable. Edit: the extreme portability and "free" concurrency were just a bonus.